You are here: indexactivitiestheme1projectssnts

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
activities:theme1:projects:snts [2016/01/16 10:41]
janin
activities:theme1:projects:snts [2016/01/16 10:46]
janin
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 ===== Description ===== ===== Description =====
-\\ +
 === Quantitative assessment of NTS in neurosurgical OR === === Quantitative assessment of NTS in neurosurgical OR ===
 +
 The objective of this section will be to define a quantitative assessment metric of NTS in neurosurgery. It will be built up from evaluation grids validated in the literature. The 3 main grids validated in the literature for the evaluation of NTS in surgery are the NOTSS, NOTECHS and OTAS (2). These scales are intended to explore all NTS (both interpersonal and cognitive). In fact, in practice they essentially analyse interpersonal skills, as they are based on analysis of behavioural markers and verbal communication. These are tested on Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion (ACIF). This surgical procedure is standardized,​ homogenous and requires an operating microscope. Assessment is  performed on data from video recordings. Analysis of videos is performed by both neurosurgeons and professionals from the field of "Human factors"​ (psychologists from the university of  Social Psychology and member of the Centre for Research in Psychology, Cognition and Communication (CRPCC, EA 1285), University of Rennes 2 – France) using the three grids previously mentioned. The feasibility,​ validity, sensitivity,​ reliability and learning curve for the use of these grids are compared. The objective of this section will be to define a quantitative assessment metric of NTS in neurosurgery. It will be built up from evaluation grids validated in the literature. The 3 main grids validated in the literature for the evaluation of NTS in surgery are the NOTSS, NOTECHS and OTAS (2). These scales are intended to explore all NTS (both interpersonal and cognitive). In fact, in practice they essentially analyse interpersonal skills, as they are based on analysis of behavioural markers and verbal communication. These are tested on Anterior Cervical Interbody Fusion (ACIF). This surgical procedure is standardized,​ homogenous and requires an operating microscope. Assessment is  performed on data from video recordings. Analysis of videos is performed by both neurosurgeons and professionals from the field of "Human factors"​ (psychologists from the university of  Social Psychology and member of the Centre for Research in Psychology, Cognition and Communication (CRPCC, EA 1285), University of Rennes 2 – France) using the three grids previously mentioned. The feasibility,​ validity, sensitivity,​ reliability and learning curve for the use of these grids are compared.
  
 ==== Qualitative assessment of NTS in neurosurgical OR: a focus on cognitive skills ==== ==== Qualitative assessment of NTS in neurosurgical OR: a focus on cognitive skills ====
- NOTSS, NOTECHS and OTAS seem well adapted to assessing ​ interpersonal skills but incomplete for full evaluation of cognitive skills. Cognitive skills are indeed often non-verbalized and lack behavioral markers to help decode them. So it seems essential, for a complete analysis of the NTS, to include a qualitative analysis of interviews with the surgeon after his operation. We would like to focus our work on cognitive skills and more precisely on assessing risks, anticipating problems and adaptative strategies . Semi-structured,​ 60-minute interviews seem to be appropriate (3). It would be a constructivist grounded theory study. Analysis of data would include thematic analysis of transcripts and field notes. Analysis would be made in an iterative manner up to thematic saturation. Data coding would be both inductive with a development of a new framework based on emergent themes, and deductive with creation of framework for assessing risks, anticipating problems and adaptive strategies ​ for the specific ACIF surgical procedure.+ 
 +NOTSS, NOTECHS and OTAS seem well adapted to assessing ​ interpersonal skills but incomplete for full evaluation of cognitive skills. Cognitive skills are indeed often non-verbalized and lack behavioral markers to help decode them. So it seems essential, for a complete analysis of the NTS, to include a qualitative analysis of interviews with the surgeon after his operation. We would like to focus our work on cognitive skills and more precisely on assessing risks, anticipating problems and adaptative strategies . Semi-structured,​ 60-minute interviews seem to be appropriate (3). It would be a constructivist grounded theory study. Analysis of data would include thematic analysis of transcripts and field notes. Analysis would be made in an iterative manner up to thematic saturation. Data coding would be both inductive with a development of a new framework based on emergent themes, and deductive with creation of framework for assessing risks, anticipating problems and adaptive strategies ​ for the specific ACIF surgical procedure.
  
 === Quantitative and qualitative assessment of NTS in neurosurgical OR with work domain variation === === Quantitative and qualitative assessment of NTS in neurosurgical OR with work domain variation ===
-This part will consist of a quantitative and qualitative evaluation of NTS in neurosurgery with work domain variation (planned versus emergency situation). The evaluation will be at this time performed on various spinal surgeries with instrumentation (implant placement). We will also use in  this part the methodology of quantitative analysis developed in the first part and the qualitative analysis developed in the second part.  
  
-1. Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N. Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating room: review ​of the literature. Surgery. 2006 Feb;139(2):140-9. +This part will consist of quantitative and qualitative evaluation ​of NTS in neurosurgery with work domain variation ​(planned versus emergency situation). The evaluation will be at this time performed on various spinal surgeries with instrumentation ​(implant placement). We will also use in  this part the methodology of quantitative analysis developed in the first part and the qualitative analysis developed in the second part
-2. Sharma B, Mishra A, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Non-technical skills assessment in surgery. Surgical oncology. 2011 Sep;20(3):169-77 +
-3. Luu S1, Patel P, St-Martin L, Leung AS, Regehr G, Murnaghan ML, Gallinger S, Moulton CA. Waking up the next morning: surgeons'​ emotional reactions to adverse events. Med Educ. 2012 Dec;​46(12):​1179-88.+
  
-{{:activities:theme1:data.jpg?​600|}} ​+  - Yule S, Flin R, Paterson-Brown S, Maran N. Non-technical skills for surgeons in the operating rooma review of the literature. Surgery. 2006 Feb;139(2):140-9. 
 +  - Sharma B, Mishra A, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Non-technical skills assessment in surgery. Surgical oncology. 2011 Sep;​20(3):​169-77.  
 +  - Luu S1, Patel P, St-Martin L, Leung AS, Regehr G, Murnaghan ML, Gallinger S, Moulton CA. Waking up the next morning: surgeons'​ emotional reactions to adverse events. Med Educ. 2012 Dec;46(12):1179-88.
  
 ===== Main Collaborators ===== ===== Main Collaborators =====
inserm rennes1 ltsi